We recently discussed the first amendment in class. We even
took a quiz that portrayed different situations and we decided if it should be
protected by the first amendment or if it is limited. A couple of the
situations we discussed involved the sticky situation between students and the
first amendment. It was concluded that students are allowed to express
themselves in anyway as long as it is not a disturbance to the classroom
environment. One situation that has recently occurred falls right under this category.
Sara Dickenson, a senior at East Haddam high school, was considered a
disturbance by wearing a breast-cancer sponsored bracelet that read, “Keep a
Breast”. Many teachers found this writing to be to provocative. One teacher
even threatened to give her a detention for wearing it. Dickenson believed that
this was a violation of her first amendment. She wore the bracelet in honor of
her grandmother who died of breast cancer. Dickenson wanted to spread
awareness. The American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut seemed to agree
with Sara, and argued that her bracelet had no disturbance in the classroom
environment. Sara also mentioned that, “… kids in [her] school walk around with
hair that is absolutely neon pink… well, [she] really feels that neon pink hair
is much more of a disturbance than a white bracelet.” Now, the final ruling
from the US Supreme Court clearly states that, “School officials may forbid
speech only when it threatens to materially or substantially interfere with the
operation of the school”. And, as such, after two years, East Haddam officials
finally allowed Sara to freely wear the bracelet. Now to me, this whole
situation seemed unnecessary because I feel Sara was never a disturbance to the
classroom environment. However, I do see the teacher’s point, but I do wonder where
do you draw the line for something to be considered a disturbance in the
school? A bracelet with provocative writing? Neon pink hair? Or even a shirt
with provocative writing?
No comments:
Post a Comment